The IETF-ISOC RelationshipEricssonGonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.comComcastjason_livingood@comcast.com
General
IETF Administrative Support Activity 2IASA
This document summarizes the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) -
Internet Society (ISOC) relationship, following a major revision to
the structure of the IETF Administrative Support Activity (IASA) in
2018. The IASA was revised under a new "IASA 2.0" structure by the
IASA2 Working Group, which changed the IETF's administrative, legal,
and financial structure. As a result, it also changed the relationship
between the IETF and ISOC, which made it necessary to revise RFC 2031.
Status of This Memo
This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is
published for informational purposes.
This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
(IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has
received public review and has been approved for publication by the
Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Not all documents
approved by the IESG are candidates for any level of Internet
Standard; see Section 2 of RFC 7841.
Information about the current status of this document, any
errata, and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
() in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with
respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this
document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in
Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without
warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
. Introduction and History
. Philosophical Relationship with ISOC
. Main Division of Responsibilities between IETF and ISOC
. ISOC's Role in the IETF Standards Process
. The IETF's Role in ISOC
. Legal Relationship with ISOC
. Financial and Administrative Relationship with ISOC
. IANA Considerations
. Security Considerations
. Privacy Considerations
. References
. Normative References
. Informative References
Acknowledgements
Authors' Addresses
Introduction and History
The Internet Society provides a corporate home for the administrative
entity that supports the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), the
Internet Architecture Board (IAB), and the Internet Research Task
Force (IRTF), and supports the work of these groups through a variety
of programs.
The Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) is the body that is
responsible for the development and maintenance of the Internet
Standards. The IETF is primarily a volunteer organization. Its driving
force is a group of dedicated, high-quality engineers from all over the
world. In a structure of working groups, these engineers exchange
ideas and experience, and through discussion and collaboration (both
electronically and face-to-face), they strive to achieve rough
consensus and implement the standards through running code.
The growth of the Internet over several decades has also led to the
growth of the IETF. More and more people, organizations, and companies
rely on Internet Standards. Nontechnical issues, such as legal,
administrative, and financial issues had long been an undesirable but
unavoidable part of the IETF. To address these issues, the IETF
established the Poised95 Working Group in 1995. Its goal was to structure and
document the IETF processes in order to maximize the flexibility and
freedom of IETF engineers so that they could work in the way the IETF
had always been most successful and to honor the IETF credo: "Rough
consensus and running code".
The Poised95 Working Group concluded that the Internet Society (ISOC),
which was formed in 1992, was the best organization to handle all of
these legal, administrative, and financial tasks on behalf of, and in
close cooperation with, the IETF. This led to documenting things such
as the IETF standards process , the IETF
organizational structure , the IETF Nominating
Committee (NomCom) procedures , and the IETF-ISOC
relationship .
As time passed and operational experience accumulated, additional
structure was necessary. As a result, the Internet Administrative
Support Activity (IASA) was defined in 2005 and documented in and .
In 2018, the IASA was revised under a new "IASA 2.0" structure by the
IASA2 Working Group, which made significant revisions to the IETF's
administrative, legal, and financial structure. One critical outcome
was the formation, in close cooperation between the IETF and
ISOC, of the IETF Administration Limited Liability Company (IETF LLC)
as a subsidiary of ISOC.
As a result of the IASA 2.0 structure and formation of the IETF LLC, the
relationship between the IETF and ISOC has changed. This document
summarizes the current state of the IETF-ISOC relationship at a high
level and replaces .
Philosophical Relationship with ISOC
ISOC and the IETF have historically been philosophically
aligned. ISOC's connection with the IETF community has always played
an important role in its policy work, which has not changed. ISOC has always been and
continues to be an advocate
for multistakeholder processes, which includes the technical
community. Open standards are an explicit part of one of the focus
areas in ISOC's mission: advancing the development and application of
Internet infrastructure, technologies, and open standards .
Main Division of Responsibilities between IETF and ISOC
The IETF remains responsible for the development and quality of the
Internet Standards. Apart from the roles described below, the IETF and
ISOC acknowledge that ISOC as an organization has no direct influence whatsoever on the
technical content of Internet Standards (though ISOC employees may independently continue to
make technical contributions as individuals).
ISOC's Role in the IETF Standards Process
ISOC plays a small role in the IETF standards process. In particular,
ISOC assists the standards process by appointing the IETF NomCom chair
and by confirming IAB candidates who are put forward by the IETF
NomCom, as described in , and by acting as the
last resort in the appeals process, as described in .
ISOC maintains liaison relationships and memberships in other
Standards Development Organizations (SDOs) and related organizations,
which directly benefits the IETF. For example, ISOC is a Sector Member
of the ITU-T. As a result, ISOC delegates are afforded the same rights
as other ITU-T Sector Members .
ISOC also supports the IETF standards process indirectly (e.g.,
by promoting it in relevant communities) through several
programs. For example, ISOC's Policymakers Programme to the IETF
(usually referred to simply as ISOC's IETF Policy Program) gives
policy experts an opportunity to interact directly with the IETF
technical community. ISOC also performs technical work using the
standards developed in the IETF as its basis. An example of that is
ISOC's work in encouraging and supporting the deployment
of IETF standards.
Otherwise, the involvement of ISOC's employees in the IETF standards
process (e.g., as document editors or in leadership positions) is as
individual contributors rather than on institutional grounds.
The IETF's Role in ISOC
The IETF plays a role in the governance of ISOC. Per ISOC's bylaws,
the IETF appoints a set of trustees to the ISOC Board. The process by
which the IETF makes those appointments is defined in .
The charter of the IAB (Internet Architecture Board) states that "the IAB acts as a source of advice and
guidance to the Board of Trustees and Officers of the Internet Society
concerning technical, architectural, procedural, and (where
appropriate) policy matters pertaining to the Internet and its
enabling technologies". This connection between the IAB and ISOC
ensures that ISOC's proposals in the policy area are based on a sound
understanding of the relevant technologies and architectures. ISOC's
strong connection to the Internet technical community has always been
one of its main strengths.
Legal Relationship with ISOC
The IETF LLC is a disregarded Limited Liability Company (LLC) of the Internet Society that was
established to provide a corporate legal framework for facilitating current and
future activities related to the IETF, IAB, and IRTF. It was established by the
ISOC / IETF LLC Agreement on August 27, 2018, and
governs the relationship between the IETF LLC and ISOC.
The IETF Trust, documented in , and updated in
and , provides legal protection for
the RFC Series of documents and other aspects of the IETF. This
includes things such as protection for trademarks, copyrights, and
intellectual property rights. As part of the IETF Trust arrangement,
IETF standards documents can be freely downloaded, copied, and
distributed without financial or other distribution restrictions,
though all rights to change these documents lie with the IETF. The
IETF Trust also provides legal protection in case of disputes over
intellectual property rights and other rights. The creation of the
IETF LLC has changed the way that the IETF Trust's trustees are
selected but did not change the purpose or operation of the Trust. One
of the IETF Trust's trustees is appointed by the ISOC's Board of
Trustees.
Financial and Administrative Relationship with ISOC
Under the terms of the Operating Agreement between ISOC and the IETF, ISOC has agreed to
provide significant funding support for the IETF. In addition,
the IETF LLC is responsible for creating and
managing an annual operating budget for the IETF; for negotiating,
signing, and overseeing contracts; for fundraising; for maintaining
bank accounts; and for liability insurance. The IETF LLC is managed by
a Board of Directors, one of whom is appointed by the ISOC's Board of
Trustees. The intention is that ISOC and the IETF LLC operate at arm's
length.
The IETF LLC establishes contracts with third parties to provide
different types of services to the IETF. Note that it is possible that
some of those services may be provided by ISOC or involve ISOC staff.
Under the new IASA 2.0 structure, the IETF LLC is solely responsible for
its administration, including the IETF Trust, IAB, IESG, IETF
working groups, and other IETF processes. A further exploration of
this can be found in .
IANA ConsiderationsThis document has no IANA actions.Security ConsiderationsThis document introduces no new security considerations.Privacy ConsiderationsThis document introduces no new privacy considerations.ReferencesNormative ReferencesStructure of the IETF Administrative Support Activity, Version 2.0Informative ReferencesInternet Society MissionInternet SocietyLimited Liability Company Agreement of IETF Administration LLCThe Internet Standards Process -- Revision 3This memo documents the process used by the Internet community for the standardization of protocols and procedures. It defines the stages in the standardization process, the requirements for moving a document between stages and the types of documents used during this process. This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.IAB and IESG Selection, Confirmation, and Recall Process: Operation of the Nominating and Recall CommitteesThe process by which the members of the IAB and IESG are selected, confirmed, and recalled has been exercised four times since its formal creation. The evolution of the process has relied principally on oral tradition as a means by which the lessons learned could be passed on to successive committees. This document is a self-consistent, organized compilation of the process as it is known today. This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.The Organizations Involved in the IETF Standards ProcessThis document describes the individuals and organizations involved in the IETF. This includes descriptions of the IESG, the IETF Working Groups and the relationship between the IETF and the Internet Society. This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.IETF-ISOC relationshipThis memo summarises the issues on IETF - ISOC relationships as the have been discussed by the Poised Working Group. The purpose of the document is to gauge consensus on these issues. And to allow further discussions where necessary. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.Charter of the Internet Architecture Board (IAB)Internet Architecture BoardThis memo documents the composition, selection, roles, and organization of the Internet Architecture Board. It replaces RFC 1601. This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.IETF ISOC Board of Trustee Appointment ProceduresInternet Architecture BoardThis memo outlines the process by which the IETF makes a selection of an Internet Society (ISOC) Board of Trustees appointment.Structure of the IETF Administrative Support Activity (IASA)This document describes the structure of the IETF Administrative Support Activity (IASA) as an activity housed within the Internet Society (ISOC). It defines the roles and responsibilities of the IETF Administrative Oversight Committee (IAOC), the IETF Administrative Director (IAD), and ISOC in the fiscal and administrative support of the IETF standards process. It also defines the membership and selection rules for the IAOC. This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.BCP 101 Update for IPR TrustThis document updates BCP 101 to take account of the new IETF Intellectual Property Trust. This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.Rights Contributors Provide to the IETF TrustThe IETF policies about rights in Contributions to the IETF are designed to ensure that such Contributions can be made available to the IETF and Internet communities while permitting the authors to retain as many rights as possible. This memo details the IETF policies on rights in Contributions to the IETF. It also describes the objectives that the policies are designed to meet. This memo obsoletes RFCs 3978 and 4748 and, with BCP 79 and RFC 5377, replaces Section 10 of RFC 2026. This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.Internet Engineering Task Force and International Telecommunication Union - Telecommunication Standardization Sector Collaboration GuidelinesThis document provides guidance to aid in the understanding of collaboration on standards development between the Telecommunication Standardization Sector of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU-T) and the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) of the Internet Society (ISOC). It is an update of and obsoletes RFC 3356. The updates reflect changes in the IETF and ITU-T since RFC 3356 was written. The bulk of this document is common text with ITU-T A Series Supplement 3 (07/2012).Note: This was approved by TSAG on 4 July 2012 as Supplement 3 to the ITU-T A-Series of Recommendations. This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is published for informational purposes.IAB, IESG, IETF Trust, and IETF LLC Selection, Confirmation, and Recall Process: Operation of the IETF Nominating and Recall CommitteesUpdate to the Process for Selection of Trustees for the IETF TrustIETF Administrative Support Activity 2.0: Update to the Process for Selection of Trustees for the IETF TrustAcknowledgements
The authors would like to thank for his contribution as
the author of , which this document
replaces.
Authors' AddressesEricssonGonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.comComcastjason_livingood@comcast.com